![]() This is then also punishable.Īnd the distributor can also not destroy it. However, according to article 7 MDG, it cannot be sent back, because then it falls “out of the scope of validity of this law”. If the distributor discovers a falsified product in the warehouse, they are liable. So one may fear that the MDG annuls the random sample inspection. In order to avoid this type of infringement, and thus a custodial sentence, every distributor must perform a 100% goods receiving inspection of the goods. ![]() The Medical Device Implementation Law MDG appears to be more rigid: There is a threat of a custodial sentence under article 59(2) if someone offers falsified products, stores them or sells them. They should be able to review whether the products actually have a CE symbol, a declaration of conformity and a UDI. ![]() The MDR allows distributors to perform random testing in Article 14 paragraph 2. C) Obligations of the distributors as a testing authority in the delivery chain (from the viewpoint of the MDG)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |